There are numerous of valid arguments for substitute methods.

4 serious risks & problems with mammograms Even though mammography is the hottest screening method for breast cancer, there are numerous of valid arguments for substitute methods. Research shows that mammograms are not the definitive response to early detection, and in fact, can often cause more problems than they solve. So what is wrong with mammography? Mammograms can truly add to cancer riskJohn W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., an authority on the effects of ionizing radiation, spent 30 years studying the effects of low-dosage radiation on humans, much like that provided in a mammogram. He approximated that 75 percent of breast cancers could be prevented by avoiding or minimizing contact with ionizing radiation from mammography, x-rays, and additional medical devices.Eshleman, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of pathology at the Johns Hopkins University College of Medicine and head of the Network Laboratory for the HIV Avoidance Trials Network, which supported the trial. ‘This analysis moves the field of HIV avoidance science forwards, leading us on a route toward curbing the HIV epidemic. It offers a fresh direction for HIV avoidance research and is beginning to shape public wellness policy.’ Eshleman says an important next step is definitely to determine whether early initiation of ARV treatment on a wider scale can reduce the spread of HIV on a community or population level.. Alliance for Quality Nursing House Care expresses alarm about CMS’ newly-published Final Rule Saying the country’s Skilled Nursing Service sector provides contributed significantly to advancing healthcare reform and deficit decrease in the face of severe condition Medicaid funding pressures and other major budgetary challenges, the Alliance intended for Quality Nursing Home Care and attention today expressed alarm about the Centers to get Medicare and Medicaid Companies’ newly-published Last Rule [ Prospective Payment Program and Consolidated Billing intended for Skilled Nursing Facilities meant for FY 2012 ], and stated it will dangerously destabilize the country’s second largest health facility employer, place patients and their care at deep risk, and place thousands of health careers in immediate jeopardy.